ETA:
- He (?) also seems to think that the 30.07 sign was left out of the sign law because of an "oversight." It was not an oversight, the sign law passed before open carry did.
- He also writes a long blurb on campus carry, then when the AG opinions came out, added this: "The attorney general has concluded that an institution may not adopt rules that are so strict they, as a practical matter, prohibit concealed carry by a license holder." Well yes he concluded that because it is central to the portion of the campus carry law that allows presidents to write rules, and it is clearly written in the statute. (Notice that he failed to include this requirement until after the AG opinion came out).
Neither of these things are "biggies," but it suggests that he doesn't yet fully comprehend what's going on with the new laws.