Apparently just insisting that the zoo follow the law is enough. Imagine the angst if it went to court and they got a $10,000/day wedgie?sjfcontrol wrote:How, exactly do you "Bully" a zoo? Knock it down and take its lunch money?
Search found 4 matches
- Sat Sep 19, 2015 6:21 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Houston Zoo
- Replies: 39
- Views: 9822
Re: Houston Zoo
- Wed Sep 16, 2015 10:24 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Houston Zoo
- Replies: 39
- Views: 9822
Re: Houston Zoo
Houston Zoo made Instapundit,
The article he linked to, from CBS News, makes no mention of the law that's driving the Zoo's compliance. And of course CBS positions three people complaining about guns in zoos higher up in the article, with only a couple supporting comments at the end.
http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/214532/CIVIL RIGHTS UPDATE: Houston Zoo forced to remove “No Guns” signs.
The article he linked to, from CBS News, makes no mention of the law that's driving the Zoo's compliance. And of course CBS positions three people complaining about guns in zoos higher up in the article, with only a couple supporting comments at the end.
- Mon Sep 14, 2015 5:01 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Houston Zoo
- Replies: 39
- Views: 9822
Re: Houston Zoo
I dunno either, but it apparently didn't stop the Ft Worth zoo from setting up one. At least it will keep their paper-pushers busy!ScottDLS wrote:.... I'm not sure how being a Day Care Center would help them unless they think it makes them a school.
- Mon Sep 14, 2015 1:39 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Houston Zoo
- Replies: 39
- Views: 9822
Re: Houston Zoo
Yeah! One down, two zoos to go.
However, the fact that they are "investigating" makes me think the sign removal was only a tactical move...while they go apply for their child care or amusement park licenses.Walker planned on taking his complaint to the Office of the Texas Attorney General before the city stepped in.
By Sunday, the signs were gone.
On Monday, zoo officials said in a statement that they were "investigating the legal implications of the request" as they honored it in the meantime.