I think it's a Constitutional crime to require a license to keep and bear arms.
On the other hand, licensed carry on a shall-issue basis is worlds better than prohibition. NAGR would prefer prohibition, at least from what I've seen.
Please fact-check me. For the moment, I think OCT and NAGR are cut from the same cloth, and achieve the same questionable results.
If I'm wrong, whip out your checkbook and give 'em a boost.
![Jester :biggrinjester:](./images/smilies/biggrinjester.gif)