Search found 3 matches

by TXBO
Fri Jun 17, 2016 2:21 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Academy, You're Fired!
Replies: 57
Views: 13935

Re: Academy, You're Fired!

I find it interesting that Academy didn't remove all the Glocks.
by TXBO
Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:32 am
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Academy, You're Fired!
Replies: 57
Views: 13935

Re: Academy, You're Fired!

RoyGBiv wrote:Below is a post I made on another gun forum......

It's much easier to MMQB Academy's response than it would be to explain to their shareholders why they didn't seek some cover when the libhadis started lobbing mortars their way. Academy is one of the retail faces of the Second Amendment. When's the last time you walked in to a Daniel Defense retail store filled with golfers, tennis players, weightlifters and joggers.?

Do I like what DD did? It certainly has some marketing panache. Was it risky for them? I'm guessing the folks that buy DD don't do so at Academy in big numbers. Just a guess.

Am I ready to throw Academy under the bus? Not nearly.

If your first move in this chess match is to fall on your sword, I don't want to play on your team.
I'm not sure from what exactly they need to seek cover.

However, as a shareholder, I'd want to know why the revenues from modern sporting rifles tanked while demand was at an all time high with no real pending litigation.
by TXBO
Fri Jun 17, 2016 9:32 am
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Academy, You're Fired!
Replies: 57
Views: 13935

Re: Academy, You're Fired!

RoyGBiv wrote:
suthdj wrote:They should get same treatment CTD got last time.
I'll respectfully disagree..

Seeking cover is not nearly as egregious as scalping.
To many, betrayal is the worst sin of all.

Return to “Academy, You're Fired!”