Search found 2 matches
Return to “John Eagle Honda Signage Report”
- Thu May 26, 2016 5:05 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: John Eagle Honda Signage Report
- Replies: 40
- Views: 10040
Re: John Eagle Honda Signage Report
There was an article in this week's Automotive News discussing reasons for posting or not posting 30.07 and 30.06 signs. Not one dealer mentioned insurance as a reason.
- Wed Apr 13, 2016 2:26 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: John Eagle Honda Signage Report
- Replies: 40
- Views: 10040
Re: John Eagle Honda Signage Report
If you will pm me the name of the person that sent you that response, I will tell you if you have the decision maker or not.LeakyWaders wrote:I decided not to have service performed on my vehicle at John Eagle Honda after noticing a 30.06 & 30.07 sign at the service center. I sent a letter similar to the one authored by "miljet" in his post titled "One Sign at a Time" dated March 1, 2016. The following day I received a reply from the dealership (see below). Has anyone else heard a similar reasoning for posting both signs at a business?
"Thanks for your email and I totally agree with you as I too have my CHL.
Unfortunately, since the open carry law was passed, our insurance companies have forced us to put both signs up or pay a big premium on our already astronomical insurance bill. They don’t want the extra liability and have forced this upon us.
I continue to argue our point and hope to one day be removing the concealed handgun sign. Please consider this when you see both signs hanging in front of stores. It is not necessarily the opinion of the owner, but are being forced due to small businesses not being able to afford higher insurance rates.
Thanks for your time and stay tuned!"