I was referring to the little known clause FAR 91.17 (a)(1)(i). It's mere existence is sensitive, and it's exact wording is highly classified. In summary though, it imposes a 12 hour limit for those of us who fly the really really fast ones in and out of Area 51. You know, ones like The Vincent Black Shadow...G26ster wrote:That's 4 hours more than FAR 91.17 requires (8 hours bottle to throttle), but hey, your rule is saferalphonso wrote:I personally practice the airplane pilot's rule "twelve hours between the bottle and the throttle" when it comes to drinking and then carrying a gun.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Texas soldier faces legal battle over gun in hospitial”
- Sat Nov 03, 2012 6:33 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Texas soldier faces legal battle over gun in hospitial
- Replies: 261
- Views: 42022
Re: Texas soldier faces legal battle over gun in hospitial
- Wed Oct 31, 2012 5:35 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Texas soldier faces legal battle over gun in hospitial
- Replies: 261
- Views: 42022
Re: Texas soldier faces legal battle over gun in hospitial
I personally practice the airplane pilot's rule "twelve hours between the bottle and the throttle" when it comes to drinking and then carrying a gun.
I do this in part because of the vagaries of the Texas law for intoxication and CHL. I wish the law was more precisely spelled out at .08 percent--or any other number. Once and a while I would like to have a beer with my BBQ or Mexican food at at restaurant, but will not because of the possibility of being stopped with alcohol on my breath.
Does anyone know (or care to hazard a guess) why the rule for drinking and carrying was not as precisely spelled out as the drinking and driving rules?
I do this in part because of the vagaries of the Texas law for intoxication and CHL. I wish the law was more precisely spelled out at .08 percent--or any other number. Once and a while I would like to have a beer with my BBQ or Mexican food at at restaurant, but will not because of the possibility of being stopped with alcohol on my breath.
Does anyone know (or care to hazard a guess) why the rule for drinking and carrying was not as precisely spelled out as the drinking and driving rules?