If the age of these efforts is any indication, I'd guess they didn't gain much traction.juno106 wrote:I'd almost suggest a legislative effort along these lines:
Mississippi: http://www.bizpacreview.com/2014/01/14/ ... lity-94257
Missouri: http://www.riverfronttimes.com/newsblog ... r-premises
Arizona: http://www.gunlaws.com/GFZ/GFZ-BillReview.htm
Texas: ?
Search found 4 matches
- Sun Sep 06, 2015 4:54 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Case Law 30:06
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1249
Re: Gun-Free-Zone Liability: Legislative efforts
- Sat Sep 05, 2015 4:57 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Case Law 30:06
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1249
Re: Case Law 30:06
I don't disagree with the principal, but I'm not a lawyer either.Eveett Walker wrote:Ok. so there have been related suits pointed toward Inadequate Security. That makes sense and explains why an activist attorney I know couldn't find any reference to PC 30:06 in WestlawNext. Still, it might be useful to document the presence of such signs at the time high profile events take place. Corporations hate negative press almost as much as lawsuits.
All of the recent incidents have happened in GFZ's and aside from people like us, I don't see a whole lot of talk about attacking 30.06ish local laws. If anything, its leading to gun control talk rather than a loosening of the restrictions.
- Sat Sep 05, 2015 4:38 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Case Law 30:06
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1249
Re: Case Law 30:06
My bad. I misread it the first time. Teach me to try and multitask, I guess.
I'm sure that the current method (suing the everloving crap out of them for insufficient security) is going to continue to be the norm. They have a right to post and we aren't forced to enter the business, so I don't think that a 30.06 posting is ever going to be used as a "gotcha!" moment for a court case.
I'm sure that the current method (suing the everloving crap out of them for insufficient security) is going to continue to be the norm. They have a right to post and we aren't forced to enter the business, so I don't think that a 30.06 posting is ever going to be used as a "gotcha!" moment for a court case.
- Sat Sep 05, 2015 2:55 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Case Law 30:06
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1249
Re: Case Law 30:06
Certainly an interesting first post. You may be in the wrong forum.Eveett Walker wrote:Is anybody aware of any case law dealing with criminal attacks in places that provide effective notice of criminal trespass with CHL? It would seem that somebody would have already tested the waters regarding injury sustained because a business deprived individuals of a publicly available remedy- the means of self defense and neglected to provide an adequate substitute=effective security? So far, the only information available is the insistence of Internet Experts that no such case has been Won, the implication that no such case has ever even been filed and therefore never will be.
With Fundraiser /Activists harassing corporations to forbid licensed carry, it might be advisable to photographically document the presence of 30:06 signs immediately after a high profile shooting event to establish that the signs were present when the event took place- in case the concern removes the signs later to avoid potential liability or unwanted media coverage.