TVGuy wrote:Many of us disagree, are not mis-informed, and are not government lobbyists. You sound much like OCT or Huffines himself.baseballguy2001 wrote:There is NOTHING wrong with those two paragraphs. The fact they (LEO's) want that language removed (or something similar) is proof they want to make stops solely on the basis of somebody open carrying.
Anybody that says that language is un-needed is either terribly mis-informed, or a government lobbyist.
Search found 4 matches
Return to “SB11 & HB910 This week....”
- Thu May 28, 2015 5:12 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB11 & HB910 This week....
- Replies: 1872
- Views: 403249
Re: SB11 & HB910 This week....
- Wed May 27, 2015 5:32 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB11 & HB910 This week....
- Replies: 1872
- Views: 403249
Re: SB11 & HB910 This week....
If I understand the law, as long as nobody in a public area can see the weapon, you're correct.Tracker wrote:huh. you can walk up and down your own property open carrying without a license right now.
- Wed May 27, 2015 5:30 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB11 & HB910 This week....
- Replies: 1872
- Views: 403249
Re: SB11 & HB910 This week....
There are a fair number of people in this forum that will probably disagree with you there.Robert91RS wrote:EXACTLY!!v7a wrote:It's blatantly dishonest to claim that police cannot ask. Police can ask whatever they want. They can try to engage in conversation with a potential suspect. Just because Open Carriers aren't obligated to display the license doesn't mean police cannot engage in different ways (including small talk).
If an officer chose to politely strike up a conversation the majority of License holders would not refuse to answer any reasonable questions.
- Fri May 22, 2015 10:00 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB11 & HB910 This week....
- Replies: 1872
- Views: 403249
Re: SB11 & HB910 This week....
Also for what it's worth, Dan Patrick is saying it needs to go back to the house.