It seems to me that if it were permanent, the barrel would be a pain to clean since the suppressor can't be taken off. In the very near future I'll be building an SBR in 300 blk and am going to just get both stamps. It'll be an 8" barrel and the suppressor is 9". To me it'll be worth the extra 200 bucks just so there is no question about legality (not saying yours wouldn't be legal if permanent, I just don't know) and I already planned on getting both stamps anyway.RogueUSMC wrote:Just toying with the idea. I have the parts for my build to the barrel nut. Now is when the decisions as to barrel, muzzle device and gas system length are being made...lol. The 15" foreend will go around a can. So if I were to go shorter on the barrel and intergrate a suppressor in the 16" total length range, it sounds like an idea but that would be $400 in stamps over and above the cost of the components. If I made the union permanent, I might be able to lose one of the $200 stamps...lol
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Question for those with NFA expertise...lol”
- Mon May 04, 2015 8:19 pm
- Forum: Rifles & Shotguns
- Topic: Question for those with NFA expertise...lol
- Replies: 33
- Views: 7971
Re: Question for those with NFA expertise...lol
- Mon May 04, 2015 3:13 pm
- Forum: Rifles & Shotguns
- Topic: Question for those with NFA expertise...lol
- Replies: 33
- Views: 7971
Re: Question for those with NFA expertise...lol
Well now y'all have me second guessing myself, lol. Now that you mention it''s going to be welded to the barrel, I think it would then become part of the barrel. Hell I don't know, lol.
- Mon May 04, 2015 1:05 pm
- Forum: Rifles & Shotguns
- Topic: Question for those with NFA expertise...lol
- Replies: 33
- Views: 7971
Re: Question for those with NFA expertise...lol
Yep, still requires both stamps. Form 1 for the SBR and form 4 for the suppressor. The suppressor is not considered part of the barrel therefore it doesn't count towards barrel length.