While liars figure and figures lie, lying to the TABC about alcohol sales is not on any business' mindset if they wish to have a good future. I'm not worried about 51% signs personally. I have no desire to be around a bunch of people drinking and drunks.MONGOOSE wrote:Liars figure.....figures lie. I'm about ready to kick all the transplants out of Tx....a lot of liberal panty waists takin over
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Majestic Theater San Antonio--Posted?”
- Sun Sep 27, 2015 5:24 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Majestic Theater San Antonio--Posted?
- Replies: 52
- Views: 15795
Re: Majestic Theater San Antonio--Posted?
- Sun Sep 27, 2015 4:53 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Majestic Theater San Antonio--Posted?
- Replies: 52
- Views: 15795
Re: Majestic Theater San Antonio--Posted?
You can't just put up a 51% sign because you feel like it though. A city building can't claim 51% if it doesn't actually make over 50% of it's profit on alcohol. If you see an improper 51, call the TABC.MeMelYup wrote:This sounds like a loophole that needs to be plugged in 2015.Keith B wrote:City Owned buildings are NOT exempt from being off-limits with a 51% sign, just 30.06. TABC requires 51% sign if the premise is licensed as 51%, so that is one way a government building CAN be restricted and off-limits to a CHL.alphonso wrote:Sroth,
Thanks for the informative answer. I think you have it right.
I spoke to the "manager" of the theater and he hardly knew a thing about the law, the theater's policies, or the signs that were/were not posted. When pressed, he finally told me that no guns were allowed to respect the wishes of the artists.
Sounds to me like putting the 51% on the whole place, which is as you know, owned by the city is just a slippery trick to abridge my 2nd amendment rights and cause me to walk around downtown unarmed.
The bowling alley analogy is helpful to understand the situation, but unless the bowling alley is city or state owned, not completely relevant.