A little different from a demolition situation but:
I worked many years for a pipeline company which had rights of ingress/egress to 5,000 miles of right-of-way. Amazing what we did to accommodate landowners, some who liked to meet us with a shotgun. They got extra 'good will' checks, free driveway paving, tree trimming, mowing, gravel, fence, gates, whatever it took. You don't want to have a pipe or microwave tower or any kind of equipment that a full time neighbor is mad about. We were especially generous to Louisiana sugar cane farmers, seems they always prevailed heavily with their damage claims in local courts. Typical award was 5 years of lost production.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Is deadly forced justified when construction company trying?”
- Sun Aug 09, 2015 3:28 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Is deadly forced justified when construction company trying?
- Replies: 74
- Views: 13325
- Sun Aug 09, 2015 12:42 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Is deadly forced justified when construction company trying?
- Replies: 74
- Views: 13325
Re: Is deadly forced justified when construction company try
But, but I'm licensed...
Step 1 is shoot, I don't need to think about step 2.
Step 1 is shoot, I don't need to think about step 2.
- Sat Aug 08, 2015 9:50 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Is deadly forced justified when construction company trying?
- Replies: 74
- Views: 13325
Re: Is deadly forced justified when construction company try
And the const co. would have long since had the sheriff remove you before the knock down.