TexasCHLforum.com

FBI News Conference reports that Page committed suicide.
They clarified that the 2nd Officer did shoot/hit him in the stomach but after he went down, he shot himself in the head with his 9mm XD.

Well, I was WRONG.........it was NOT a Glock he used!

According to the link in the following thread:
viewtopic.php?f=83&t=57151&p=701204#p701204" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

He used a Springfield Armory XD-series 9mm with a 19-round capacity

Watch for the call to further push a ban of High Capacity Handgun "Clips".

Is the "Puzzle" coming together yet?

Not to suggest a conspiracy, but the name George Soros keeps bouncing around in my head!

jocat54 wrote:Lots of us served more than one tour in Vietnam.

Yep, I personally served 4 tours.
Not only that, while others were draft dogging, I joined. I was 17 & 1/2 and joined. Never saw a draft card.

philip964 wrote:Are 88 guns per 100 people too many?

I'd like to know how they come up with that number when they can't even keep up with the number of guns THEY let walk into Mexico!

Does that 88 per 100 include all the illegal guns?
Does that 88 per 100 include all LEO guns?

OK, let's take the 100.....who exactly are they?
Who, exactly is the 88 guns in that group?

Just where does that number come from?

I'll tell you from where...........from the imagination of some Left Wing Loonie that wants to sensationalize his rhetoric. Nothing they say is the truth!

And we know that to be a "Good Dem" you cannot know how to count!
Anything a Dem says that has a number in it is nothing but a lie!

That 88 is a low number anyway and they should be happy with it. I own 10 guns. If only 49 others here in Texas owned the same number as I, the numbers would be 500 per 100 (for that particular 100). Just proves how stupid this 88 per 100 is. At what point do you stop and average all samples to come up with 88 per 100? Would that be the correct picture? Of course not.

I am at the point now that I don't even listen to their lies anymore.

Yep......
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/08/06/si ... rack-hate/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Page, who served in the military for six years but was never stationed overseas, was a psychological operations specialist and Hawk Missile System repairman.

Well, with all the rounds he was shooting, it kinda sounds like it MAY have been a Glock. Just sayin.......

Of course if it was a Glock, the Dems will use that as a "Plastic Pistol that cannot be detected" even though WE know that is a lie. They will also jump on the "High Capacity Magazines". They just haven't figured that out yet.

Just watch how they turn whatever it was.

Here's a just released picture of the shooter.

xb12s wrote:I hadn't seen the Active White Supremacist link yet. Thanks for that update. Not that I don't believe it, but do you have a link to something on that?

It was reported on air by Fox this morning, along with a report of a "9mm handgun" being used.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/08/06/au ... z22kaYJb99" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

FBI Special Agent in Charge, Teresa Carlson, said a motive is still under investigation, and noted that authorities are looking at Page's "ties to white supremacist groups".

Officials said the gunman, whom they identified as Wade Michael Page, walked into the Sikh Temple of Wisconsin on Sunday and opened fire with a 9mm handgun as several dozen people prepared for morning services.

He was NOT Active Duty Military. He was a Veteran.

He was separated in 1998 as an E4 (after a reduction in rank) under a "Other than Honorable" (Administrative) discharge.

He was an active White Supremacist.

EDIT: Reported by on air Fox this morning.

Another News Conference at 10am CT today on Fox. Hopefully we will find out what gun/guns were used.

apostate wrote:

Oldgringo wrote:There's a pretty big difference between a Sheik and a Sikh...isn't there?

Indeed. I was thinking more along the lines of Arabia Shrine when I saw the Sheik Temple subject line.

Thanks.
I edited the OP to correct that.
Breaking news at the time of post and I did not pay enough attention to the correct spelling.

puma guy wrote:Location, Location, Location. Guns outlawed in NYC = weapon of choice being bats and swords.
Sikh temple attack in NYC.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/2 ... 53863.html

Date, Date, Date......
That Huff Post article is from 4/26/2011.

But I agree it is a fine example that guns are not the problem. Thanks!

News conference corrected an error in reporting that a single officer shot and killed the shooter.

They said that two officers responded and engaged the shooter outside. The shooter ambushed the first officer (20yr Veteran) and wounded him seriously. The 2nd officer (who was not injured) shot and killed the shooter.

On Scene News Conference on FOX scheduled for 4pm CST.

They are searching every room, closet, etc to find people that may still be hiding and trying to determine if there is more than one shooter.

They are working two crime scenes.....inside and outside.
4 dead inside and 3 dead outside. Shooter is one of the 3 dead outside.

The LEO who first responded and killed the shooter is a 20 year Veteran and trained as a Tactical Officer.