You would probably win the Court case but you would be out a WHOLE LOT 'O MONEY!TrueFlog wrote:Here's a question... Let's say that you witness one of these events in progress and decide to intervene. (I'm not saying it's a good idea - just what-if.) It's not worth shooting the kid over a pair of jeans, so you tackle him and attempt to detain him. I believe you'd be within the law to do so - using non-lethal force to prevent theft. Most likely, his buddies are going to swarm on you, attacking you in a 10-on-1 beating. Fearing for your life, you draw and fire on the attackers. Would that be A) justified because of the disparity of force or B) unjustified because you initiated the confrontation by trying to detain the kid? I think we can all agree it would be a bad situation, but I'm curious as to the legal considerations.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Flash Mob robbries”
- Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:19 pm
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Flash Mob robbries
- Replies: 19
- Views: 2851
Re: Flash Mob robbries
- Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:43 pm
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Flash Mob robbries
- Replies: 19
- Views: 2851
Re: Flash Mob robbries
Or me with the Hi-Power and 40 rounds!
Realistically, you'd only have to shoot one, maybe two.....the rest would scatter.
Realistically, you'd only have to shoot one, maybe two.....the rest would scatter.
- Tue Jul 19, 2011 5:04 pm
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Flash Mob robbries
- Replies: 19
- Views: 2851
Re: Flash Mob robbries
Shop elsewhere, walk out.