Okay, it was a tongue in cheek attempt at sarcastic humor, and the statement was intended to be non-factual and ridiculous. And you are 100% correct.seamusTX wrote:No, you don't...
The question that the antis refuse to answer is why this guy was not in prison after multiple convictions for violent felonies.
- Jim
![tiphat :tiphat:](./images/smilies/tiphat.gif)