Not running around saying the sky is falling here, just an interesting (and potentially scary) precedent.
"Deputy Claeys testified “both passenger side tires were over the fog line” and “completely off the roadway” “twice.”" - Apparently the video in question does not show this happening.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Indiana Supreme Court - 'Officer Testimony' > Video Evidence”
- Tue Sep 02, 2014 2:13 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Indiana Supreme Court - 'Officer Testimony' > Video Evidence
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1870
- Tue Sep 02, 2014 8:20 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Indiana Supreme Court - 'Officer Testimony' > Video Evidence
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1870
Indiana Supreme Court - 'Officer Testimony' > Video Evidence
Not directly gun/self-defense related, but worth taking a note of.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140 ... ence.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Some scary stuff.
"Seeing how often official reports by law enforcement are contradicted by video recordings, you'd think judges would have become a bit more skeptical about the supposed "superiority" of officers' recall powers. But that's apparently not the case, at least not in Indiana, where the state's Supreme Court has ruled that officer memory trumps video recordings."
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140 ... ence.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Some scary stuff.
"Seeing how often official reports by law enforcement are contradicted by video recordings, you'd think judges would have become a bit more skeptical about the supposed "superiority" of officers' recall powers. But that's apparently not the case, at least not in Indiana, where the state's Supreme Court has ruled that officer memory trumps video recordings."