And what prevents them from using other LEO agencies who might be a tad better trained in such things? I guess then you might need to have a little smaller government.EEllis wrote:And what makes you believe they will be? Purchasing such things would allow the agents to have access to such weaponry but it doesn't indicate anything more than that.bigity wrote:It seems if they are worried enough about an arrest/investigation to bring submachine guns, and have supporting factors that indicate a particular person(s) could be dangerous, they could contact another agency or bring a HTR team who is appropriately armed.
I'm not sure preemptively carrying around automatic weapons is the response to this list I guess is what I'm trying to say.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “U.S. Dept of Agriculture to purchase .40S&W Submachine Guns”
- Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:18 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: U.S. Dept of Agriculture to purchase .40S&W Submachine Guns
- Replies: 75
- Views: 9535
Re: U.S. Dept of Agriculture to purchase .40S&W Submachine G
- Wed Oct 29, 2014 8:14 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: U.S. Dept of Agriculture to purchase .40S&W Submachine Guns
- Replies: 75
- Views: 9535
Re: U.S. Dept of Agriculture to purchase .40S&W Submachine G
It seems if they are worried enough about an arrest/investigation to bring submachine guns, and have supporting factors that indicate a particular person(s) could be dangerous, they could contact another agency or bring a HTR team who is appropriately armed.
I'm not sure preemptively carrying around automatic weapons is the response to this list I guess is what I'm trying to say.
I'm not sure preemptively carrying around automatic weapons is the response to this list I guess is what I'm trying to say.