They really aren't... every term he used is already defined in the statute. This is more of a show that he is trying to do "something" but those bad republicans keep getting in the way.cb1000rider wrote:The terms are pretty vague - so if there are no cases establishing thresholds, my guess is that he can very much change if he can order enforcement...
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Buy/Sell private individuals”
- Tue Jan 05, 2016 11:41 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Buy/Sell private individuals
- Replies: 18
- Views: 2814
Re: Buy/Sell private individuals
- Tue Jan 05, 2016 7:58 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Buy/Sell private individuals
- Replies: 18
- Views: 2814
Re: Buy/Sell private individuals
Exactly... pandering to his constituents, trying to look like he is doing something... yet these things are already law today.CleverNickname wrote:All that happened was the president went on TV and cried. Literally nothing changed in regards to non-licensees selling firearms. Read the law, it's pretty self-explanatory:
18 USC 921:(21) The term “engaged in the business” means—
...
(C) as applied to a dealer in firearms, as defined in section 921(a)(11)(A), a person who devotes time, attention, and labor to dealing in firearms as a regular course of trade or business with the principal objective of livelihood and profit through the repetitive purchase and resale of firearms, but such term shall not include a person who makes occasional sales, exchanges, or purchases of firearms for the enhancement of a personal collection or for a hobby, or who sells all or part of his personal collection of firearms;