Search found 2 matches

by TVGuy
Wed Jun 25, 2014 11:34 am
Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
Topic: Critical legislation for 2015
Replies: 206
Views: 38456

Re: Critical legislation for 2015

Teamless wrote:
RoyGBiv wrote:As much as #5 is an annoyance, I'm surprised it's getting so many votes.
If I know a sign is unenforceable, I ignore it.
I use the gun show issue:
When the gun show is at Pasadena Convention Center, owned by the City of Pasadena, and they have 30.06 warnings, with police officers inside also asking you (sometimes) if you have a gun on you, etc, and threatening to arrest you if you carry past the sign, then for that reason I felt this needed to be a topic to be fixed

I cannot take the chance to be arrested, even if they have no case.
I don't have the extra money just laying around to fight the case
I don't have a bank full of money to use when I cannot work, as I am in Jail, or have an issue which now prevents me from doing my job.

There are many other instances where they wrongfully post the 30.06, KNOWINGLY. and it needs to stop.
I couldn't agree with you more. Any instance where it further clarifies existing rights are important. I know I won't get the rap, I don't want the ride either if I've done absolutely nothing wrong.
by TVGuy
Wed Jun 25, 2014 11:25 am
Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
Topic: Critical legislation for 2015
Replies: 206
Views: 38456

Re: Critical legislation for 2015

Would #9 (repeal law "...to cause alarm...") effectively make printing legal without question?

Return to “Critical legislation for 2015”