I believe under federal law, medical marijuana is not legal. Anyone that smokes pot in CO therefore cannot legally buy a firearm if they answer the question on the 4473 truthfully.TomsTXCHL wrote:Can't include caffeine or nicotine, which afaik are not "controlled substances".sjfcontrol wrote:Hmmm... Especially if that includes caffein or nicotine. Note that it's "unlawful user of, OR addicted to"Jumping Frog wrote: The really sobering portion of that decision is the court's finding of materiality in the false statement. This may give pause to folks who fib a little on Question 11(e).
11(e). Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?
This also reads to me like prescribed (medical) marjuana would still mean "no".
Search found 2 matches
Return to “buying guns for someone else”
- Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:46 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: buying guns for someone else
- Replies: 68
- Views: 7841
Re: buying guns for someone else
- Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:41 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: buying guns for someone else
- Replies: 68
- Views: 7841
Re: buying guns for someone else
ThisJumping Frog wrote:This may be a good moment to pause and reflect on the truth of the saying "elections have consequences".C-dub wrote: It's also slightly amazing that anyone would even bother taking this case to court when they don't bother with the thousands of others, including felons, that try to purchase firearms from stores ...
All the righteous people who valiantly refused to vote for the imperfect (R) alternative because he failed to be conservative enough can look in the mirror when contemplating the names "Sotomayor" and "Kagan". Wouldn't it have been nice to have nominees who would have joined an opinion with Scalia, Roberts, Thomas, and Alito?
There is a lesson here for grown-ups willing to listen when 2016 rolls around.