Of course not. If they were honest, their arguments would never hold up! Instead, they have to bend (and often break) the truth into a lie in order for their agenda to make sense to even themselves.Charles L. Cotton wrote:She testified against campus-carry i a Senate hearing and told this story in a way that made it sound like her son murdered his father with a gun. It was intentionally deceptive testimony. She was the second liar to testify in the same hearing.
Anti-gun organizations and people don't hold honesty in high regard.
Chas.
Her testimony was a classic example of "my son did this, so I expect everyone of that age to act the same." Classic hoplophobe projection. She intentionally used misleading testimony to manipulate emotions instead of relying on facts. Laws should never be created out of emotion, especially false ones.