cb1000rider wrote:jbarn wrote:
On the cell phone issue, if officers get it in their hands incident or as part of a search and it's unlocked, courts have ruled it fair game.
Since the "safety" of the officer is the reason for disarming you, I can see the natural extension of the court's current latitude until a ruling changes it..
Actually, the display of insurance on the cell phone has one other part to it that states:
(d)The display of an image that includes financial
responsibility information on a wireless communication device
under Subsection (a)(2-a) does not constitute effective consent for
a law enforcement officer, or any other person, to access the
contents of the wireless communication device except to view the
financial responsibility information.
[/quote]