Yeah, think that's the one. I admit to not having read it other than a brief glance. Perhaps the reason for not hearing that one is different than this situation.rbwhatever1 wrote:I think they refused to hear the Chicago case which may be the same thing. I'm not aware of any others.
http://thehill.com/regulation/court-bat ... weapon-ban
Search found 2 matches
- Fri Dec 25, 2015 6:50 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: US v Watson
- Replies: 6
- Views: 925
Re: US v Watson
- Fri Dec 25, 2015 5:44 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: US v Watson
- Replies: 6
- Views: 925
Re: US v Watson
Doesn't their argument though seem to be in conflict with the recent SCOTUS decision to uphold bans on assault weapons? (it's early, and am hoping that I'm remembering that post correctly as I didn't find it in a quick search)