baldeagle wrote:We need people to attend these meetings and speak out, intelligently and reasonably. The first thing they need to understand is they are not going to get LTC information. That is against the law. They also need to be educated on what the laws are and what the record of LTC holders is over the past 20 years.
If they are serious about improving mental health reporting, all well and good, but people's rights must be respected as well.
I agree with you, but sadly the law can change.
I lived somewhere where the information was held by circuit courts and access could be gained, and it was then released. Then the law changed to prohibit any release. Then after a change in leadership (to a party more friendly to their cause) they worked on getting the law changed again to allow release. Fortunately that didn't gain traction. One reason was that there were a couple of instances where after that information was published in the local paper, houses were then burglarized. I can see this one coming, as to some people, being "outed" for having a CHL might mean that they choose to not have one. I wouldn't be at all surprised to see this push coming, and probably driven by someone like Bloomberg.