Was thinking along the same lines there! I think having to switch out the magazine to get a good amount of rounds through it would be a bother, but hey, that's a good excuse to get extra magazines.WildBill wrote:The more I look at the SR22, the more I like it. Now if the only made a double stack magazine.
I decided to reply on my thread again, not only to thank everyone for expressing their opinions of the Ruger SR22, but to ask another question.
Does anyone have any comments about the Ruger SR9c ?
![BigEar :bigear:](./images/smilies/bigear.gif)
I ask because my hubby decided not to wait to get his 9mm, and today we took it to the range to practice. It is a springfield armory XDS 9mm.
![Image](http://xdspistol.com/images/gallery-xds13.jpg)
I was amazed at how little the recoil was. I found that it had me less fazed than the kick from (now "my") old Ruger .380. If the Ruger 9mm's will be similar to SA9 then I think I'd be very pleased to own/carry a 9mm vs the 22. (As I'm sure some of you are happy to hear!)
He is in love with the feel of the gun, and tried out many before deciding on it. I really like the safety features, but for some reason I think the Ruger just felt better in the hand. The SR9c seems to have a similar trigger safety, which is nice, and from my quick reading it looks like it might be possible to get a 17 rd magazine for it? The wording on the webpage seems a bit strange to me. I'd love for it to be able to carry more than 10 rds, if for nothing else it'd be nice not to have to reload every two minutes when on the range.