TexasCHLforum.com

phddan wrote:It has been suggested many, many times that to keep law abiding CHLers out of your house, all you need to do is post, or give verbal.
Both Right2Carry, and BrassMonkey have refused to address this option.
Why is this??

Dan

phddan wrote:

If some plumber is rooting around undee the sink, there is no reason he can't go over and watch and even help.

No No No No No

Good gravy, I can't believe you are serious. It's bad enough when grown ups get in the work space, but your going to let a child watch and help???!!!!!
That child ought to be in another room, or at least no where near a service man.

Wow

Dan

llwatson wrote:

BrassMonkey wrote:Exactly, if they are properly concealing, I would never know.

And yes, if they have a CHL they ARE exactly who I would want around. Just not with a firearm when my son is home.

And I agree with you, their "verbal" is my, "Leave"

And for the record, I think every non criminal should be allowed to carry. And it should be a heck of a lot simpler and less time consuming to get a license. If it should even be licensed. It should all be handled at the local level, as in, local town or city. At the very worst, at the County level. Why can;t I go buy me CHL from Academy at the same time I buy my fishing license every year? If should still remain a State mandated "Shall" issue as well. The County takes taxes every yeay from me, why shouldn't someone suggest that it is handled locally? No need to go into great detail on this one as I am just stating my feelings on whether I am the only one I want to carry or not.

Over the last number of months, I have formulated a conclusion based solely on these board posts. It seems from my observations that some CHL holders feel they are a protected class of citizen. They feel and attempt to demonstrate that anyone who infringes on their right to be possesing a firearm on or about their person, by utilizing their right to infringe, such as a homeowner or business owner must be evil. Or support criminals and the like.

Our right to posses a firearm does not trump others rights to not allow it in their home. Your right to religion does not allow you to force religion on others. Our right to free speech does not allow us to infringe on others rights by saying I am going to blow up this plane, whethe ryou mean it or not. Your right to carry a bic lighter walking down the street does not take the TSA's right to confiscate it at the airport. In this case, you have two options, leave, or comply and get on the plane, yes it is perfectly legal to have a bic lighter in your pocket. And umbrellas, same thing. Notice I am referencing harmless inanimate objects here. There is no 1:1 comparison that I can think of for CHL Holder Vs. CHL Holder yet wants to control his home, but there are plenty that come pretty close.

Monkey Boy,

You have been gone for a month or so, and now you come back and resurrect all this old garbage...

Didn't they have any de-caf in India?

iflyabeech wrote:S-35 Beech for fun

C-421C for work

iflyabeech wrote:Your kid grabbed an cops gun on more than one occasion and you just had a talk....
I would have had a red rear end and a long stay with my nose in the corner. And when I got my nose out of the corner, it would have been turn over the flower beds for a week duty. . . .

You had better stop that pretty quick!