shootthesheet wrote:If you had received a letter on company letterhead and signed by an authority of the company I would say it might be okay for YOU to carry at TC. You got a phone call, the contents of which cannot be proved, that will do nothing either for you or for any person carrying into TC. I will not go there because they have the sign that exists to restrict us and no one else as well as refuse to remove it. That is risking the possible loss of my rights to exercise the state sold privilege of CHL. The "non-compliant" sign will keep CHL holders out for fear and a very justified one. TC are cowards and anti-2A in my opinion. Enjoy yourself but I will be at a place that actually recognizes the futility of punishing law abiding citizens. And that is no attack on the OP. Just on the company that wants to sell me a product but refuses me the ability to defend myself and my family.
OK....Help me out here. How can you be LEGALLY arrested for a sign that is NOT 30.06 compliant? Intent has no bearing here. The law was written as to what was a LEGAL 30.06 sign to clear up this confusion and worry. The way I see it is if a LEO places you under arrest or even hassles you, ask for his Sgnt to come to the scene and prove him wrong OR right.
Furthermore, KEEP IT CONCEALED