Search found 1 match

by TomV
Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:29 am
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: This is an interesting take on GFZ
Replies: 11
Views: 2513

Re: This is an interesting take on GFZ

It seems it would be impossible to prove.

As the article states: The injured party would have to show they were injured because they were not carrying in the GFZ where if it were not a GFZ the injured party would have been carrying a weapon and most probably would have not been injured due to the carrying of said weapon.

Too many what-ifs for my taste.

Return to “This is an interesting take on GFZ”