I think the sign should apply just like it does to me. It is notice.C-dub wrote:I think that is correct OlBill. There is no sign that would prevent a police officer from carrying into a Sprouts, for example, but if they receive oral notification that they are not allowed to carry their gun into the store even if they are in uniform and not in their official capacity the officer would still have to leave. They can return without their handgun just like the rest of us can, but I'm not sure how many LEOs or us would actually return unarmed.OlBill wrote:My understanding is you can exclude them, police don't have to follow The Sign, is that incorrect? Isn't that what happened to the Conroe police chief?ScottDLS wrote:
What about the classes that the State doesn't let you exclude? Off duty cops, emergency volunteers, special investigators, your employees carrying in your parking lot, etc....
They have to have verbal notice?
Search found 5 matches
Return to “another 30.06 question”
- Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:19 pm
- Forum: New to CHL?
- Topic: another 30.06 question
- Replies: 84
- Views: 54231
Re: another 30.06 question
- Sun Aug 13, 2017 2:49 pm
- Forum: New to CHL?
- Topic: another 30.06 question
- Replies: 84
- Views: 54231
Re: another 30.06 question
My understanding is you can exclude them, police don't have to follow The Sign, is that incorrect? Isn't that what happened to the Conroe police chief?ScottDLS wrote:
What about the classes that the State doesn't let you exclude? Off duty cops, emergency volunteers, special investigators, your employees carrying in your parking lot, etc....
They have to have verbal notice?
- Sat Aug 12, 2017 10:45 pm
- Forum: New to CHL?
- Topic: another 30.06 question
- Replies: 84
- Views: 54231
Re: another 30.06 question
Thank you. That needs to be corrected.aero10 wrote:Actually, 46.15 states otherwise.TreyHouston wrote:An off duty police officer (yes, its a job) has to follow the same rules as every citizen out there. There are no "special accommodations". Now, do other police officers cut them some slack? Yes.OlBill wrote:And that needs to be corrected.aero10 wrote: This isn't true. 30.06/7 has no bearing on off-duty police officers, even if they have a LTC.
If I believe correctly, only detectives, cheif, and ?sheriff? are immune when off duty BUT can not drink if carrying.
Sec. 46.15. NONAPPLICABILITY.
(a) Sections 46.02 and 46.03 do not apply to:
(1) peace officers or special investigators under Article 2.122, Code of Criminal Procedure, and neither section prohibits a peace officer or special investigator from carrying a weapon in this state, including in an establishment in this state serving the public, regardless of whether the peace officer or special investigator is engaged in the actual discharge of the officer's or investigator's duties while carrying the weapon;
- Sat Aug 12, 2017 10:44 pm
- Forum: New to CHL?
- Topic: another 30.06 question
- Replies: 84
- Views: 54231
Re: another 30.06 question
So an officer cannot walk past a 30.06 sign?TreyHouston wrote:An off duty police officer (yes, its a job) has to follow the same rules as every citizen out there. There are no "special accommodations". Now, do other police officers cut them some slack? Yes.OlBill wrote:And that needs to be corrected.aero10 wrote: This isn't true. 30.06/7 has no bearing on off-duty police officers, even if they have a LTC.
If I believe correctly, only detectives, cheif, and ?sheriff? are immune when off duty BUT can not drink if carrying.
- Sat Aug 12, 2017 8:31 am
- Forum: New to CHL?
- Topic: another 30.06 question
- Replies: 84
- Views: 54231
Re: another 30.06 question
And that needs to be corrected.aero10 wrote: This isn't true. 30.06/7 has no bearing on off-duty police officers, even if they have a LTC.