People bearing arms are members of a "protected class".
I despise public accommodation laws in the private sector, but they aren't ever going away. Might as well get on the bandwagon.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Unrestricted Carry For LTC - What Would You Be Willing To Give Up?”
- Tue Oct 11, 2016 7:17 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Unrestricted Carry For LTC - What Would You Be Willing To Give Up?
- Replies: 89
- Views: 13635
- Tue Oct 11, 2016 7:12 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Unrestricted Carry For LTC - What Would You Be Willing To Give Up?
- Replies: 89
- Views: 13635
Re: Unrestricted Carry For LTC - What Would You Be Willing To Give Up?
Jusme wrote:I don't think we need to "give up" anything. Requiring more training, for a constitutional right, flies directly in the face of "Shall Not Be Infringed", of which, we already have enough examples. I think that we should be able to legally carry anywhere LEO are permitted to carry. With the only restricted areas, being secured areas of jails and prisons, and secured areas of an airport. Even off duty, LEO can carry in courtrooms, even if they are party to a case, not connected with their job duties, including divorce, child custody, civil lawsuits etc. Off duty LEO can carry into any public school in Texas, professional, college, and high school sporting events, and TABC posted 51% premises.
They are not required to perform any additional firearms training by law, and are only required to meet the minimum standards of TECLOSE required continuing education courses. Each department may set different standards. Our record of being law abiding, far outweighs that of LEO, but we are still regarded, as somehow less competent. Please understand, I am not trying to bash LEO, I used to be one, so my experience with the requirements, is first hand.
So to answer your question, we already "give up" far too much, while still being denigrated to second class citizen status, by the general public, and lawmakers. JMHO