Would you pick up a pistol in a holster from a table and point it in someone's face?harrycallahan wrote:Your first two paragraphs are in conflict. I agree a muzzle sweep is a safety violation and I agree shoulder holsters are safe, but that's not what you're saying is it? Or is it? Because if you really believe shoulder holsters are safe then by extension you cannot believe that you can be swept by one. Or can you? Second, you're usually the first to point this out to an OP so I'm a bit surprised you did it. I cannot accept your "I know" as factual information alone in either case that you've used it. Elaborate how a sear failure is only dangerous while in a should holster and how that makes a shoulder holster unsafe. I understand that you and most OPs don't like them, but please do not distort firearm safety rules and use fear just to make your point. If it is etiquette reform or firearm safety training from a defensive draw scenario using a shoulder holster then that makes sense. Everything else is indeed a rant.Charles L. Cotton wrote:I have to disagree with you there. When I'm teaching a class, if the muzzle of a student's handgun points at another student, then the offending student has swept another person with their muzzle, regardless of their placement of their trigger finger. When the muzzle points at something "you are not willing to destroy," that person or thing has been swept.android wrote:A pistol in a holster that properly covers the trigger isn't sweeping or flagging or muzzle covering or whatever you want to call it.OlBill wrote:RULE 2
NEVER LET THE MUZZLE COVER ANYTHING YOU ARE NOT PREPARED TO DESTROY
I don't flag. I don't like being flagged.
It's an inert object with regards to safety and gun handling unless you put your paws on it.
Yes, horizontal shoulder holsters are safe when properly designed and used for a specific handgun. Nevertheless, at a minimum it is extremely rude and irresponsible to openly wear a horizontal shoulder holster and put other people in fear. I know how they work and I have one of every type (for demonstration purposes) but there's no way on this earth I'd knowingly stand behind some wearing one and stare down the barrel. Safety rules are protocols and protocols are effective only when you follow them all the time.
BTW, covering the trigger may not be the end of the story. For striker-fired weapons it is, but not for hammer-fired handguns. Those handguns need to be secured with a strap that is between the hammer and firing pin because a sear an fail. I know, I had it happen.
Chas.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Mini Rant over HB910 and Horizontal Shoulder Holsters”
- Wed Jul 22, 2015 9:40 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Mini Rant over HB910 and Horizontal Shoulder Holsters
- Replies: 97
- Views: 16388
Re: Mini Rant over HB910 and Horizontal Shoulder Holsters
- Wed Jul 22, 2015 9:34 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Mini Rant over HB910 and Horizontal Shoulder Holsters
- Replies: 97
- Views: 16388
Re: Mini Rant over HB910 and Horizontal Shoulder Holsters
Flagging is about the muzzle, not the trigger.android wrote:A pistol in a holster that properly covers the trigger isn't sweeping or flagging or muzzle covering or whatever you want to call it.OlBill wrote:RULE 2
NEVER LET THE MUZZLE COVER ANYTHING YOU ARE NOT PREPARED TO DESTROY
I don't flag. I don't like being flagged.
It's an inert object with regards to safety and gun handling unless you put your paws on it.
No different than sitting with an appendix carry holster or tying my shoes with a gun on my side and passing my arm under the barrel.
- Mon Jul 20, 2015 7:52 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Mini Rant over HB910 and Horizontal Shoulder Holsters
- Replies: 97
- Views: 16388
Re: Mini Rant over HB910 and Horizontal Shoulder Holsters
RULE 2
NEVER LET THE MUZZLE COVER ANYTHING YOU ARE NOT PREPARED TO DESTROY
I don't flag. I don't like being flagged.
NEVER LET THE MUZZLE COVER ANYTHING YOU ARE NOT PREPARED TO DESTROY
I don't flag. I don't like being flagged.