Search found 6 matches
Return to “Hearing Protection Act of 2017”
- Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:00 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: Hearing Protection Act of 2017
- Replies: 148
- Views: 50411
Re: Hearing Protection Act of 2017
Couple of million dreamers are more important.
- Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:33 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: Hearing Protection Act of 2017
- Replies: 148
- Views: 50411
Re: Hearing Protection Act of 2017
ScottDLS wrote:When my daughter was 6 years old she used to make a ridiculous statement, then follow it loudly with the statement "I'M SARCASTIC!". I just depend on people recognizing my rapier sharp wit and Beavis and Butthead avatar.
- Wed Oct 11, 2017 1:39 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: Hearing Protection Act of 2017
- Replies: 148
- Views: 50411
Re: Hearing Protection Act of 2017
ScottDLS was being sarcastic.MeMelYup wrote:A guy and several of his buddies brake into your house wanting anything they can get. Do you want a firearm that will shoot only once every two seconds, or one that will shoot every time you pull the trigger no mater how fast? Would you rather have a five round magazine, or a thirty or sixty? Would you rather have a silencer on your firearm, or a loud ringing in your ears that gets more intense each time you pull the trigger? Not saying the silencer would knockout the noise and ringing, but it would not be as intense, especially with an SRB.ScottDLS wrote:What we really need is a Federal law banning and confiscating autoloader rifles that are not equipped with a rate of fire slowing device (ROFSD), that keeps you from pulling the trigger more than once every two seconds. All existing semi-rifles must be registered IAW NFA after having ROFSD installed. And if you are discovered pulling the trigger of your semi-auto more than once per 2 seconds you will be guilty, you lose your gun and are guilty of a felony. Most responsible ranges already prohibit rapid fire, so this is a simple, common sense, gun law that even the NRA should be able to get behind.
And why does anyone need drum magazines that hold 50 or 100 deadly bullets? These are unnecessary and illegal for deer hunting so they should be banned.
- Thu Oct 05, 2017 3:11 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: Hearing Protection Act of 2017
- Replies: 148
- Views: 50411
Re: Hearing Protection Act of 2017
The snark is strong in you.ScottDLS wrote:What we really need is a Federal law banning and confiscating autoloader rifles that are not equipped with a rate of fire slowing device (ROFSD), that keeps you from pulling the trigger more than once every two seconds. All existing semi-rifles must be registered IAW NFA after having ROFSD installed. And if you are discovered pulling the trigger of your semi-auto more than once per 2 seconds you will be guilty, you lose your gun and are guilty of a felony. Most responsible ranges already prohibit rapid fire, so this is a simple, common sense, gun law that even the NRA should be able to get behind.
And why does anyone need drum magazines that hold 50 or 100 deadly bullets? These are unnecessary and illegal for deer hunting so they should be banned.
- Thu Oct 05, 2017 2:56 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: Hearing Protection Act of 2017
- Replies: 148
- Views: 50411
Re: Hearing Protection Act of 2017
Rob Peter, pay Paul.TreyHouston wrote:OK, if thats what the left wants!BBYC wrote:That would be an actual compromise. Put slidefire stocks on the registry with an amnesty period to register tax free, and in exchange take suppressors off the registry. Throw in national reciprocity and I might support the compromise.
Throw the Slidefire owners under the bus.
Why is it that a segment of firearms enthusiast always loses in any compromise and the left always gains something?
- Tue Oct 03, 2017 5:24 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: Hearing Protection Act of 2017
- Replies: 148
- Views: 50411
Re: Hearing Protection Act of 2017
Once there is a GOP majority in the house and senate we will get some of these useless gun laws eliminated.mrvmax wrote:Yep and I doubt it will ever make it this far again.TexasJohnBoy wrote:Dead.
http://nypost.com/2017/10/03/bill-to-ea ... slaughter/
House Speaker Paul Ryan on Tuesday said Republicans have shelved a vote on NRA-backed legislation that would ease restrictions on the use of silencers in the aftermath of the massacre in Las Vegas that killed 59 people and wounded hundreds.
“That bill is not scheduled now,” the Wisconsin Republican said. “I don’t know when it’s going to be scheduled.”
Oh. Never mind.
The GOP will save us.