TexasCHLforum.com

JALLEN wrote:

anygunanywhere wrote:

JALLEN wrote:

anygunanywhere wrote:

Topbuilder wrote:Oh, my mistake. I thought we were talking about the GOP that was not able to win elections.

The gop lost the last two elections with the worst president in history in the White House. You knew I was talking about presidential elections. Klin-ton will be the next president for two terms. The majorities in the house and senate are useless since you did not provide any evidence that they neutralize zed the tyrant in chief. The gop cannot win the White House.

Not to quibble, but the worst President in history wasn't in the White House yet the first time. He was "clean and articulate," it was "historic" and the GOP did not really field a major league slate.

As Mark Steyn points out, it's hard to elect a conservative government in a liberal culture, as those terms have come to be used in contemporary parlance.

To quibble, opinions on who is the worst president is just an opinion.

If you are going to quibble, at least quibble over the right thing. The worst President in history wasn't yet in the WH at the time of the 2008 election. He only got there afterwards. He was there for the 2012 election.

JALLEN wrote:

anygunanywhere wrote:

Topbuilder wrote:Oh, my mistake. I thought we were talking about the GOP that was not able to win elections.

The gop lost the last two elections with the worst president in history in the White House. You knew I was talking about presidential elections. Klin-ton will be the next president for two terms. The majorities in the house and senate are useless since you did not provide any evidence that they neutralize zed the tyrant in chief. The gop cannot win the White House.

Not to quibble, but the worst President in history wasn't in the White House yet the first time. He was "clean and articulate," it was "historic" and the GOP did not really field a major league slate.

As Mark Steyn points out, it's hard to elect a conservative government in a liberal culture, as those terms have come to be used in contemporary parlance.

Topbuilder wrote:Oh, my mistake. I thought we were talking about the GOP that was not able to win elections.

Topbuilder wrote:"The dems elect their candidates.

The gop cannot."

8 years of Bush... Lost to Oblamer...Took the House back... you do remember piglousy was in charge... "Land slide" Republican victories nation wide. Took the senate back... Now leading what should have been a coronation, while bleeding DNC coffers.
Sounds like the little train that could?