Here comes the last GOP loser. Insanity. Obamacare lite architect.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ ... story.html
Search found 7 matches
Return to “Good intentions v. good tactics”
- Sat Jan 10, 2015 1:49 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: Good intentions v. good tactics
- Replies: 61
- Views: 8561
- Sat Jan 10, 2015 8:40 am
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: Good intentions v. good tactics
- Replies: 61
- Views: 8561
Re: Good intentions v. good tactics
The reason it makes no difference who we vote for is because all of them are the same. Reference my sig line.jmra wrote:And the democrats rejoiced.chuck j wrote:With so many people that share your view maybe not . That is the reason we have the situation we are in now . I'll no longer be a sucker for the Republicans .jmra wrote:A democrats third best friend is a conservative who votes for a third party candidate that can't possibly be elected.
- Fri Jan 09, 2015 10:22 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: Good intentions v. good tactics
- Replies: 61
- Views: 8561
Re: Good intentions v. good tactics
They didn't want to lose their positions of power. Power means everything in DC.G26ster wrote:TAM, I think they did in '64 when Barry Goldwater lost the 1964 presidential election to Lyndon Johnson by "one of the largest landslides in history." And back then, the country was far more conservative than it is now.The Annoyed Man wrote: It's a shame too, because all that the elites would have to do is say "OK, we'll try it once your way" to the party's conservatives.
I still would like to know where the conservatives were in the latest election for Speaker. Only 25 votes against? If conservatives wanted a change, they had a great chance. Seems to me almost everyone was protecting - themselves. The opportunity to send a strong message was lost.
- Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:56 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: Good intentions v. good tactics
- Replies: 61
- Views: 8561
Re: Good intentions v. good tactics
You can't vote yourself freedom.baldeagle wrote:Then I chose to sit out. Let the country rot, and let our descendants mourn the loss of freedom. Maybe in a few centuries another group will rise up, as our forefathers did, and build a country based on freedom. If you ask me to vote for a McCain, McConnell or Boehner, then I chose to sit out.Charles L. Cotton wrote:The Country has changed and it isn't going back. People can either sit out and whine, or they can get involved and make the best of a bad situation.
Chas.
- Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:03 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: Good intentions v. good tactics
- Replies: 61
- Views: 8561
Re: Good intentions v. good tactics
Bravo.baldeagle wrote:This article perfectly sums up what's going on, and the GOP ignores the signs at their peril. The party is on the precipice of collapsing. It won't take much to tip the balance. http://www.americanthinker.com/articles ... ation.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
And then, yes, at the national level you will have Democrats for a LONG time. If that's what you want, push a Christie, Romney or Bush and tell conservatives to take their medicine. It ain't happenin. Not this time. Not after the betrayal of 2014.
- Fri Jan 09, 2015 12:56 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: Good intentions v. good tactics
- Replies: 61
- Views: 8561
Re: Good intentions v. good tactics
I don't think any republican ticket will get elected to the white house in 2016. The voting block that will decide the election, the same that put the current loser in the white house, will put the next one in as well. This group does not want moderates. Congress might very well stay in GOP hands, but we will have to see.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Christi has no chance. Explain why no Republican candidate that you want can get the nomination. I'll save you some time; those people don't have the support because American voters want moderates.anygunanywhere wrote:We aren't going to get a candidate from the republican wing of the GOP. You can bank on Bush, or Christi, or another democrat GOP. Why vote? Nothing is going to change. Stroo's post is right on. This is why true republican voters stay home.
Elected officials didn't ruin the Country, Americans ruined the Country. They want to be able to kill babies under the guise of "choice." They claim to want fiscal responsibility, but they want their Senator or Representatives to make sure pork barrel funds come to their state and town. They can't accept the simple truth that, if you don't work, you don't eat, so they raid the Social Security Fund to provide aid to dependent children and all sorts of welfare.
No Senator or House Member elected themselves; it was done by their constituents and the idea that there is a majority of conservative voters who just sit out elections is a pipe dream. White voters who make up the majority of conservatives turned out in record numbers in 2012 and Obama was still reelected.
The Country has changed and it isn't going back. People can either sit out and whine, or they can get involved and make the best of a bad situation.
Chas.
I do agree with your overall assessment of the current situation and the outlook for the future.
Making the best of the bad situation has little to do with voting because just from what I have seen since the most recent election, voting does nothing.
- Fri Jan 09, 2015 7:54 am
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: Good intentions v. good tactics
- Replies: 61
- Views: 8561
Re: Good intentions v. good tactics
We aren't going to get a candidate from the republican wing of the GOP. You can bank on Bush, or Christi, or another democrat GOP. Why vote? Nothing is going to change. Stroo's post is right on. This is why true republican voters stay home.