Sorry Charles. I made my comment based on your post:Charles L. Cotton wrote:I didn't say that and it doesn't. But if people start talking about it enough, insurance companies will learn it and stop covering gun shows.anygunanywhere wrote:So insurance trumps state law in government owned buildings. Interesting.
Chas.
If no venue will rent to a gun show promoter unless there are no loaded firearms and this includes government owned venues then the insurance companies are requiring government entities to violate state law.Charles L. Cotton wrote:
This is an insurance requirement. No venue will rent a building to a gun show promoter unless they provide proof of insurance coverage. Insurers will not insure a gun show unless there's a rule against loaded firearms at the gun show.
This is has been argued many times before, but the simple fact is without insurance, there will be no gun shows. I don't like it either.
Chas.
I am not being argumentative, I am just trying to understand why this is allowed when the law is so clear.