Search found 3 matches

by anygunanywhere
Wed Mar 12, 2014 12:27 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes
Replies: 341
Views: 68374

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

VMI77 wrote:Another more plausible explanation?

http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=228843&page=2
A November 2013 FAA Airworthiness Directive for the 777

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013...2..." onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for

certain The Boeing Company Model 777 airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by a report of cracking in the fuselage skin underneath the
satellite communication (SATCOM) antenna adapter. This proposed AD
would require repetitive inspections of the visible fuselage skin and
doubler if installed, for cracking, corrosion, and any indication of
contact of a certain fastener to a bonding jumper, and repair if
necessary. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct cracking and
corrosion in the fuselage skin, which could lead to rapid decompression
and loss of structural integrity of the airplane.

Summary: Its plausible that a fuselage section near the SATCOM antenna adapter failed, disabling satellite based - GPS, ACARS, and ADS-B/C - communications, and leading to a slow decompression that left all occupants unconscious. If such decompression left the aircraft intact, then the autopilot would have flown the planned route or otherwise maintained its heading/altitude until fuel exhaustion.
A slow decompression (e.g. from a golfball-sized hole) would have gradually impaired and confused the pilots before cabin altitude (pressure) warnings sounded.
Chain of events:

Likely fuselage failure near SATCOM antenna adapter, disabling some or all of GPS, ACARS, ADS-B, and ADS-C antennas and systems.
Thus, only primary radars would detect the plane. Primary radar range is usually less than 100nm, and is generally ineffective at high altitudes.

If the decompression was slow enough, its possible the pilots did not realize to put on oxygen masks until it was too late. (See Helios 522)

Also explains why another Pilot thirty minutes ahead heard mumbling from MH370 pilots.
(VHF comms would be unaffected by SATCOM equipment failure.)

With incapacitated pilots, the 777 could continue to fly on Autopilot - programmed to maintain cruise altitude and follow the programmed route. Using the Inertial Reference System (gyroscope based), the plane could navigate without needing GPS.
Other thoughts:

The plane was equipped with cellular communication hardware, supplied by AeroMobile, to provide GSM services via satellite. However this is an aftermarket product; its not connected through SATCOM (as far as I know).
This explains why 19 families signed a statement alleging they were able to call the MH370 passengers and get their phones to ring, but with no response.
When Malaysian Airlines tried to call the phone numbers a day later, the phones did not ring. By this time, fuel would have been exhausted.

Note: 777 Passenger Oxygen masks do not deploy until cabin altitude reaches 13,500. Passengers were likely already unconscious by then, if it was a slow decompression. Also remember that this flight was a red-eye, most passengers would be trying to sleep, masking alarming effects of oxygen deprivation. No confirmed debris has been found anywhere near the search area, consistent with the plane having flown for hours after it lost radar contact.
Conclusion:
This was likely not an explosive decompression or inflight disintegration. This was likely a slow decompression that gradually deprived all crew/passengers of oxygen, leaving the autopilot to continue along the route autonomously.
But it still would have been visible to military radar and someone knows something.

Anygunanywhere
by anygunanywhere
Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:23 am
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes
Replies: 341
Views: 68374

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

mojo84 wrote: I also think the Malaysian government is hiding something.
This^^^^.

Anygunanywhere
by anygunanywhere
Mon Mar 10, 2014 2:57 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes
Replies: 341
Views: 68374

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

philip964 wrote:A facebook friend posted what I presume is a tacky post " Kate we have to go back to the island"

I assume this is a Lost reference.

RIP and my condolences to the friends and family, this is everyone's worst news.

As each hour goes on with no news it makes it seem so much like it is terrorism.

They are saying there were 5 no shows. We wonder if their luggage was boarded. The two false id's reservations were made over the phone by a third party and the two men paid in cash naturally.

Everyone pays in cash for intercontinental travel. Don't you.

The 777 has not had a death that was its fault. That's pretty safe.

Pilot had 18,000 hrs and had a flight simulator in his home he liked it so much.

So unless it suffered the fate in Lost, there is wreckage, and not lots of little pieces as the Challenger crew cabin was in large pieces.

They will find it but will we be told it is terrorism? Maybe still upset over the video.
I read in one of the stories I think on Fox news that the no-show's luggage had been removed prior to departure.

Anygunanywhere

Return to “Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes”