LEO is a job and the perceived special privileges with respect to second amendment rights that they should enjoy simply because they go to school is counter to what this country was founded on. If your assertion were true, there are many individuals who are trained to a higher degree than most LEOs, so they should have privileges that far exceed LEO. I find your insistence insulting to the vast majority of firearms enthusiasts and those on this forum.dac1842 wrote:I thought I had posted this in response to this poll, but I don't see it, so if this is a duplicate post I apologize.
1- The private property owner has the right to control that property under his/her care, custody and control. Their rights do supersede the privilege enjoyed by a CHL holder. Personally If I owned a retail establishment, restaurant or other place like that, I would not prohibit concealed carry.
2- Some posters have stated that a CHL holder should have the same rights as an off duty LEO... really? If you want the same privileges as a LEO, go to an academy.
there is no comparison to what a LEO goes through to get the unrestricted privilege and class/range time a CHL goes through.
Now having said that, I don't think anyone, LEO or otherwise should carry in a bar, or while intoxicated.
Anygunanywhere