Cedar Park Dad wrote:I don't have to. There is nothing in the US Constitution that says I have to convince others that I have a right to marry.anygunanywhere wrote:Actually, saying that homosexual marriage does not affect those in the normal definition of marriage and even society as a whole is conforming to the collectivist route. Homosexual marriage falls in line with the collectivist reasoning that morality, and right and wrong are objective and that there really is no wrong as long as what people do does not affect someone else.Cedar Park Dad wrote: Yes. It means you can't think of something to show where it has an impact on your marriage.
Unless you want to go down the nice collectiveist route of course. Sorry but that doesn't work for me.
You can continue to assert your contention that since no one can (more likely will since it involves sin) state ways in which their marriage is affected by homosexual marriage if you want to have some moral high ground. Tell us ways in which it doesn't. Convince us. Convince us that this is an appropriate way to raise children. Convince us that this is the way God intended for us to live.
Anygunanywhere
You want others to post reasons supporting their statements but you don't have to? You have insisted at least three times. Also, my post had absolutely nothing to do with the constitutionality of your marriage.
Anygunanywhere
