Thus the term "low information voters".cw3van wrote:JALLEN wrote:I consider all Democrats either socialists or communists, a distinction without a difference as far as I am concerned.
There was a time when the Democrats were not socialists. I certainly don't think of Harry Truman or John Kennedy as socialists. Something happened during the '60's, when the old Communist Party USA which had been infiltrated by the FBI, and couldn't even hold a picnic, aligned itself with the doper dirtball hippies of that era, avowed socialists, and made common cause together. Those doper dirtballs of the McCarty/McGovern era eventually took over the Democrat Party and turned it to socialism and communism which has now become fixed in their value system. The old playbook was out the window, replaced by Alinski et al. I refer to the Clinton/Fonda/Ayers/Kerry crowd.
None of them want to admit it, because the term still carries "high negatives" with voters. If they knew what they wanted to do, they wouldn't get any votes.Yes sir that just about sums it up as well as I've heard it put.
Anygunanywhere