Search found 3 matches

by anygunanywhere
Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:33 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: UN Arms Treaty
Replies: 16
Views: 956

Re: UN Arms Treaty

Dadtodabone wrote:The U.S. Senate must consent to any treaty entered into by the Executive. And that consent must be in the form of a 2/3 majority vote before ratification can take place. There isn't a snowballs chance in a furnace, that the ATT would ever clear the Senate. Mr. Obama and Mr. Kerry are playing to a foreign audience they feel is more important and influential than the American people. All the while knowing that Senate consent was a dead letter. This will play out just like Kyoto, a rejected treaty used by the Socialist masquerading as President, and his minions, to hammer his political opponents.

You mean that piece of paper called the Constitution? With the BOR?

Shall not be infringed?

Hahahahahahahahahaha!

They don't need no stinking Constitution!

SInce when has this meant anything?

Anygunanywhere
by anygunanywhere
Thu Mar 28, 2013 1:43 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: UN Arms Treaty
Replies: 16
Views: 956

Re: UN Arms Treaty

AndyC wrote:Oh, you said "interesting" - somehow I read that as "very noisy". Carry on :mrgreen:
Ear plugs.

Anygunanywhere
by anygunanywhere
Thu Mar 28, 2013 9:44 am
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: UN Arms Treaty
Replies: 16
Views: 956

Re: UN Arms Treaty

From the same website is this on the final version of the treaty.


http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/it ... s-on-track

Anygunanywhere

Return to “UN Arms Treaty”