You reckon that I am not all that concerned with printing and unintentional falure to conceal because I check to make certain I am concealed and I am aware of my cover garments when I carry?Oldgringo wrote:You reckon that the problem might lie in convincing the LEO AND the judge that the exposures weren't intentional?anygunanywhere wrote:Neither printing nor unintentional faillure to conceal are offenses under state law. How can they be a problem if they are not illegal?stash wrote:I support OC if for no other reason the problem with printing/unintentional failure to conceal problem that we have seen here in the past. I assume OC would eliminate these possible problems.
Oops - I think CHL should be required for OC as opposed to no license.
Anygunanywhere
If spmeone is falsely arrested then there is a way to adress that issue.
Anygunanywhere