Kalrog,Kalrog wrote:I don't care to be the test case either.
None of us would want to be the test case.
This vague area is another example of issues that require clarification.
IMHO, the restriction IS a violation of my 2nd amendment rights.
Why must we be prevented from defending ourselves in post offices?
I have heard and read many times "I will not go where I can not carry".
Well, I don't belive that for a second. We do have to go where we are "legally(?)" restricted from carrying.
I am in agreement that if a person were to carry concealed on government property and is legally allowed to carry, it is not against federal law.
A person must be able to defend himself.
'Nuff said.