k5dmb wrote:I totally understand... I too am against licensing to exercise our 'rights'. But I know a lot of folks that are 'legal to purchase' but should not be carrying. How do we sort them out or force some training. It would be a lot simpler if we had mandatory military service, but that's another issue.
I'm afraid that too many would spoil what we few have fought hard for.
Thoughts?
Sorting out citizens that enjoy the same rights that you have is really none of our concern. The constitution and BOR does not make any differentiation on rights based on intelligence, skill or experience. You cannot legislate away stupidity and ignorance.
Although most here would admit that stupid, ill-informed voters should not be allowed to vote, or that stupid, ill-informed journalists should not be allowed to publish, but that is not the case.
I have read that many of the individuals currently rushing to buy firearms have never owned a firearm. They are probably not trained in the use and care of the firearms, and will probably not seek the training. Some will, of course, and then possibly those will coach the untrained and unskilled to improve their abilities.
We must foster the proper attitude among new firearm owners lest they develop the nasty irreverant attitudes that often surface from well intentioned individuals.
Freedom can be a dangerous thing in the hands of the untrained, but that is still freeedom. Shackling freedom with training requirements is just another form of "sensible gun laws" and "reasonable restrictions". The antis are chomping at the bit to force that on us. Don't give them any room to expand because it will get US nowhere.
Realistically we can eventually eliminate these training requirements but that should be down the list. Once we are successful at restoring our OC rights and eliminating other roadblocks to where we can carry then we can work on the other issues.
/thread hijack
Anygunanywhere