And your statements are all well thought out, logical, and reasoned beyond reproach?casingpoint wrote:There is a horde of people giving lip service to justify the Joe Horn shootings.
I think the grand jury justified it. If the Pasadena Police Department and Harris County District Attorney could not produce sufficient evidence to indict in a shooting that was witnessed by a detective then I would say it is pretty much resolved. What you would do in your own situation is your business, but the fact that you state you would handle the situation any better is absurd because we really do not know how you would react in any given situation.
Using the facts to support an argument is far and away not lip service. All we have is your statements that you think Mr. Horn should have been tried, convicted, and sentenced. The only thing I can be sure of is that I would not like to have you on a grand jury examining any shooting I am ever involved in and Ihave no doubt whatsoever that I would not want you on a jury where I am a defendant because you seem to have the habit of convicting people without a trial.
Anygunanywhere