TexasCHLforum.com

Tactical_Texan_CHL wrote: But to be totally honest, I find her presence here very unsettling, and I'm not really comfortable with her.

If I could actually put into words what went through my head when I read her first post and saw that nasty mug of BHO on her sig line....definitely not 10 year old daughter material.

Being right of center, even extreme is not required for hanging out here but it helps. We have members who are democrats, and I can accept the old Zell MIller democrats that the lefties abandoned. They vote pro-2A. I am sympatghetic to them because the GOP has abandoned me and gone left.

What bothers me the most about Amber's type is that they espouse rights and freedom, but want to take mine away.

They must learn that where my rights begin, theirs end. The lesson needs to be painful.

Anygunanywhere

Mike1951 wrote: She could possibly be naively ignorant regarding RKBA and I think that is why she has been tolerated this long.

Mike,

An individual that joins this site wearing the Obama banner in their signature line spouting about their having a CHL, a firearm, and spouting about disliking "assault weapons" is hardly someone desiring to learn more about freedom and spreading liberty.

We certainly must tolerate her to a point. I doubt we will convert her.

If it walks like a troll and talks like a troll........

Anygunanywhere

drw wrote:

anygunanywhere wrote:Frankie, you really are not worth the trouble. You are an annoyance.

Use the "Ignore user" feature by adding him as a foe in your profile. Then the problem goes away.

Thanks. I had noticed that feature.

Anygunanywhere

frankie_the_yankee wrote:Well, I don't think that is what the thread is intended to be about.

frankie_the_yankee wrote:And be it noted that I have posted

frankie_the_yankee wrote:I will now use the thread to point out

frankie_the_yankee wrote:And furthermore, I will also state that it is my opinion

frankie_the_yankee wrote:So there you have it.

I guess that does it. Take this to the bank. The over-riding opinion.

Anygunanywhere

boomerang wrote:The OP is free to clarify whether they meant infringement of RKBA like in the subject or if they only wanted to know about firearm confiscation.

centex aggie wrote:thanks fellers

The OP posted after Liberty and I posted our responses. As I read his response above, he was fine with what Liberty and I posted. This was before the hullabaloo was initiated.

Anygunanywhere

Frankie, you really are not worth the trouble. You are an annoyance.

Anygunanywhere

The fact is that you pointed out Liberty and me for a thread hijack. If you had the information you posted above you should have posted that instead of hassling Liberty and me.

If the OP or a moderator wants to take me to task then they are free to do so. Not you.

Anygunanywhere

frankie_the_yankee wrote:
Total thread hijack. The OP was clearly referring to extraordinary situations like the aftermath of hurricane Katrina, not absolutist views of the 2A.

Frankie, kind of like the pot calling the kettle black.

You being one of the leading proponents of reasonable restrictions on this board, you can't attack the message so you attack the messenger.

I will be certain to point out your next hijack.

I did not see your handle in blue so I don't think you are a moderator either.

Anygunanywhere

Second amendment rights are suspended every day. Whenever you are required to obtain a license to arm yourself your right has been infringed.

Every time you have to fill out a 4473 your rights are infringed.

Every time you have to leave your firearm in your car or residence to enter where you are legally allowed to be your rights are infringed.

Anygunanywhere