TexasCHLforum.com

powerboatr wrote: ↑Tue Nov 16, 2021 5:20 pm

philip964 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 16, 2021 5:01 pm https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa ... n-n2599144

Beating a dead horse but, Prosecutor may have committed a misdemeanor.

Shows which lady he pointed the rifle at.

Idiot post says but it wasn’t loaded. Ask Alec about that as well.

that would worth watching him be arrested at end of trial.

when or if kyle is found NG, he should sue biden for defamation of character for calling him a racist and white supremacist last year

i have never been in a bar fight either.. but i would never take fists to a gun fight

I forget where I saw it but one vlawgs I have been watching covered this. Essentially KR can sue, but his damages are very limited due to the damage the trial has done to his character.

Deitz83 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 12, 2021 5:16 pm All Kyle needs is 1 or 2 jurors to not agree. I can't see all of them agreeing on a guilty verdict.

The problem is the jury is from Kenosha where the majority of people think he's guilty just because he was there and the media told them so. The defense has worked very hard to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory on this one, they didn't even comfort or talk to Rittenhouse when he came off the witness stand.

striker55 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 12, 2021 1:01 pm I wish Rittenhouse had said he feared for his life. I didn't watch it all.

Rittenhouse did say that if Rosenbaum got his gun then he was certain he would have been killed by the deceased. He didn't use the phrase, but he did say as much.

This is a prosecutor that will be remembered for either a miraculous victory because of a biased jury or as an absolute failure. No prosecutor should ever put themselves in a position where the judge gets that angry with them, in fact no attorney should ever do that!

While the court is in recess for lunch let me just say that after the cross examination the Jury can't help but question every aspect of the prosecution since they were depending on this witness. The body language of the prosecution, especially stay-puff's multiple face palms, only cements my belief that the defense has already won most of this case as long as the jury isn't blatantly biased.

I just watched the defense impeach the prosecution witness Grosskreutz, who was shot in his arm, with their first question in less than thirty seconds. Then it goes downhill for the prosecution from there. Looks like the witness may have just scuttled his civil lawsuit too during the defense cross-examination.

The Annoyed Man wrote: ↑Wed Nov 03, 2021 2:46 pm

AndyC1911 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 03, 2021 12:14 pm This attorney's perspective: What's on trial here is your, mine, and everyone's right of self-defense:

I watched one of that guy's videos for the first time yesterday. He makes a lot of sense.

Tonight's live stream "Sidebar with Greg Hartley! Viva & Barnes LIVE" has some discussion on the Rittenhouse case, including that the prosecution played videos that had been originally live streamed with prejudicial comments shown (and possibly computer spoken), then they move on to the actual topics they wanted to discuss.

It seems that there has been a little bit of a shakeup on the defense legal team, the Viva Frei youtube livestream from 11/1/21 has more details from Robert Barnes who is no longer on the team.

Robert Barnes, who is a part of Rittenhouse's defense team, cohosts a weekly live stream (Sundays) on the youtube channel Viva Frei. As I understand it Barnes role is more to handle PR and advise, so you can often get an idea of how the defense is reacting to things from the Viva Frei channel. Although I also suspect that he may feed disinformation as well. His various statements and reactions to the state's behaviour regarding the use of force expert witnesses is interesting.