TexasCHLforum.com

bblhd672 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 7:57 am So as NRA members we are supposed to just accept that our dues and contributions are being funneled to the political campaigns of those who wish to destroy not only the 2nd Amendment but the NRA itself without expressing any concerns? That members are actually supporting the agenda of those who refer to us as bitter clingers and deplorables, those who go out and boldly lie about everything we believe in?

So you would prefer that our dues be paid to a less capable attorney and put the future of the NRA at even greater risk rather than someone who is the beat but donates a PART of their income to our opposition(note that even then only a fraction of that donation will be used against us)?

Sadly Tom Gresham has jumped on the "NRA BAD!!!!" bandwagon based on his recent tweets. I even tweeted a link to a previous post from Charles and called Tom's attention to it. Got a boiler plate reply that referenced media statements made by NRA officials before Tom deleted his tweet. It's been a while since I paid any attention to Jeff Knox, but Tom is sounding a lot like Mr. Knox who at one time made me think he only wanted to lead a revolt within the NRA much like his daddy did.

Don't get me wrong, Jeff seems like he is a nice guy if you ever talk to him and very passionate about gun rights but sometimes one's passion can cloud their vision and make them see enemies where only friends stand.