If you are flying aa UAS around 6,500 feet ASL with an elevation of approximately 5,000 feet you must be flying illegally, with a waiver of some sort, flying a high end government bird, or something else is going on.
Search found 4 matches
- Fri Sep 18, 2020 5:09 am
- Forum: Site Announcements, Questions & Suggestions
- Topic: Drones
- Replies: 64
- Views: 40834
Re: Drones
- Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:29 am
- Forum: Site Announcements, Questions & Suggestions
- Topic: Drones
- Replies: 64
- Views: 40834
Re: Drones
Part 107 is only required for commercial operations, but the FAA's definition of commercial is rather expansive.oohrah wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:01 amI know drones have to be registered with the FAA. Do you also have to have a Part 107 license, or is that just for commercial?nightmare69 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 02, 2020 9:16 am As a drone hobbyists and Texas LEO, no you cannot shoot down a drone. You own the property not the airspace above it. Now if someone is flying 15ft above your backyard looking around your property, call the police. If I’m flying 200ft above I assure you my camera zoom isn’t like that of a military predator drone even though my DJI Mavic is a $1k drone.
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 9:28 am
- Forum: Site Announcements, Questions & Suggestions
- Topic: Drones
- Replies: 64
- Views: 40834
Re: Drones
imkopaka wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:55 amGood lord, is ANYTHING legal in these United States anymore??jrs_diesel wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:39 amDepends. Microwave has a very short wavelength, and power diminishes quickly with distance (inverse square law) like any radio wave. You would need a powerful transmitter, a very tightly focused beam, and a way to aim it. What it would do if it works is overload the circuits with energy. That could damage the circuits in a way that would render the drone inoperable, or cause erratic operation.crazy2medic wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:16 am What would a focused beam of microwave energy do to a drone?
Some drone are autonomous, most are radio controlled. Most of the RC ones are programmed to land upon loss of the RC signal so as not to fly into anyone/anything and cause damage. One could jam the RC signal more easily than the microwave beam. Either method would very likely fall under unlicensed transmitters that the FCC regulates (i.e. it's illegal).
Usually it is when it involves damaging or destroying peoples property that is in what is considered to be a public space/resource. Now we need to remind the folks with BLM/ANTIFA.
- Wed Apr 03, 2019 8:48 pm
- Forum: Site Announcements, Questions & Suggestions
- Topic: Drones
- Replies: 64
- Views: 40834
Re: Drones
No, it IS a federal felony. The FAA regulates drones (unmanned aircraft) as aircraft which means that 18 U.S. Code § 32 comes into play which makes it a felony to damage or destroy an aircraft. In fact it is a felony to even threaten to do so. Now that we have that out of the way no one has been prosecuted for shooting, shooting at, or threatening to shoot a drone.
If the unmanned aircraft was capturing an image of your property then Texas Government Code 423 does provide you with some recourse if you can identify the remote pilot.
If the unmanned aircraft was capturing an image of your property then Texas Government Code 423 does provide you with some recourse if you can identify the remote pilot.