IE - may have eliminated the need for a local FFL when you buy a firearm from an FFL in another state? (not 100% sure)
It's clearly eliminated the need for two FFLs if you go over a state to buy a handgun...
The broader context escapes me...
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Restrictions on Interstate Sales/Transfers-UNCONSTITUTIONAL”
- Wed Feb 11, 2015 4:09 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: Restrictions on Interstate Sales/Transfers-UNCONSTITUTIONAL
- Replies: 36
- Views: 19185
- Wed Feb 11, 2015 3:31 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: Restrictions on Interstate Sales/Transfers-UNCONSTITUTIONAL
- Replies: 36
- Views: 19185
Re: Restrictions on Interstate Sales/Transfers-UNCONSTITUTIO
It appears to be pretty narrow, only striking down 3 things:
§ 922(a)(3), 18 U.S.C. § 922(b)(3), and27 C.F.R. § 478.99(a)
Anyone want a shot at the cliffs notes of what they are?
§ 922(a)(3), 18 U.S.C. § 922(b)(3), and27 C.F.R. § 478.99(a)
Anyone want a shot at the cliffs notes of what they are?