TexasCHLforum.com

So that's what I don't get. The tests for impairment are the same. There isn't a special "pot" test.
If you're impaired, you should be arrested and then blood tested to figure out the cause.
If you're not impaired, why do we have to keep snooping around?

CoffeeNut wrote:Are they forcing tests on everyone at the checkpoint or just those who don't answer the questions coherently? Just curious because I've never been through one.

You have the right to remain silent, unless you're asked a question at a checkpoint.
Seriously, they're going to stop whomever tickles their fancy for whatever reason.

If a DUI stop is "legal" - I really don't have an issue for testing for other *currently intoxicating* drugs. I do have an issue on the legality of a "stop everyone" stop.

A "little" violation of the constitution is still a violation of the constitution. That's how we got where we are with the 2nd amendment.