TexasCHLforum.com

Good post.. Thank you.

Cedar Park Dad wrote:He had his head handed to him in the debates. I'm not seeing how he is going to do better against A Team competitors this time around.

The commentary that I heard was that he'd need some time off to "study up" for those debates... I think the damage is already done.

I've been busy listening to the hearings... All I've heard is claims that this is protecting women health, not outright admissions to protecting the unborn.

I do stand corrected, the official press releases indicate that it's about both - protection of the unborn and womens health... I was wrong on this... Didn't do enough digging on my own.

Pacifist wrote: Really? And exactly what is more "far right" to the garden-variety libtard than the protection of unborn children?

According to the Republicans in Texas, they're not challenging Row vs Wade, they're putting in place steps to better supplement the safety of mothers.
Wait, you don't believe the party line?

That particular issue is polarizing. It's black or white. And it's in line with everyone to the right of middle.

Rrash wrote: I think that is the whole reason he didn't push for any CHL bills.

He can't push for anything too far right if he's going to run for president again. Predication: If he''s running for president, expect everything far right to be back burner-ed enough to keep that support, but no real movement on it.

No way he can come back for president after his showing last time... It's just too late.